July flash sale
A company does not need the same Kanban course for every employee. A team that cannot see or finish its work has a different learning need from a delivery manager redesigning an end-to-end service. Scrum teams with chronic carry-over face a different starting point again. Course selection should follow the work problem.
Kanban University’s course catalog presents several entry points. For the AgileSeekers portfolio, the practical corporate choices are Team Kanban Practitioner, Kanban System Design, Kanban Systems Improvement, and Scrum Better with Kanban.
Start with the operating problem
| Observed need | Likely course | Application after class |
|---|---|---|
| A team needs shared visualisation and basic flow habits | TKP | Improve one team board and daily work decisions |
| A service needs an end-to-end system design | KSD | Map demand, workflow, policies, WIP, and expectations |
| An existing Kanban system has stalled | KSI | Diagnose and run evidence-based improvements |
| A Scrum team has carry-over, delays, or unmanaged work | Scrum Better with Kanban | Add flow practices without replacing Scrum |
Four course choices, four different promises
TKP creates a practical team baseline
Team Kanban Practitioner training fits contributors, team leads, and managers who need work visibility, collaboration, and basic flow decisions. It is a sensible shared starting point when the immediate issue is that work is hidden or constantly started without being finished.
KSD develops system designers
Kanban System Design goes further into service-oriented thinking and system design. Choose it for Scrum Masters, delivery managers, project managers, Agile coaches, and operational leaders who can influence workflow and policy across a meaningful service boundary.
KSI supports improvement after a system exists
Kanban Systems Improvement training is not a substitute for establishing the system-design foundation. It fits people responsible for feedback loops, evolutionary change, flow review, and sustained improvement after Kanban is already operating.
Scrum Better with Kanban begins from Scrum problems
Scrum Better with Kanban is the focused choice when teams intend to retain Scrum and use Kanban practices to address delays, dependencies, predictability, unplanned work, transparency, or resistance to change.
Do not buy certification seats without application access
Learners need a service, workflow, or team context where they can test what they learn. If policies are centrally controlled and managers will not permit an experiment, the training may create vocabulary without change. Secure a sponsor, identify one pilot area, and agree which decisions the cohort can make after class.
- Bring current workflow data and examples of demand.
- Name the manager who can approve policy changes.
- Schedule a review two to four weeks after training.
- Track one or two flow signals rather than a large maturity scorecard.
- Capture what the pilot learns before expanding to more teams.
Cohort design matters more than uniformity
Some learning should be shared across roles; some should not. A useful corporate pathway may give a broad group TKP, send service owners and improvement leads into KSD or KSI, and offer Scrum Better with Kanban to selected Scrum teams. This creates common language without asking every learner to solve a problem they do not own.
Questions for the provider conversation
- Which course matches the evidence we are seeing today?
- Can exercises use our service examples without exposing confidential data?
- Who should learn together, and which roles need separate depth?
- What trainer experience is relevant to our industry and service type?
- What post-class review or application support is available?
- How are official materials and credentials handled for each learner?
Use the AgileSeekers corporate training enquiry to share the audience, work problem, preferred dates, and number of learners. A useful proposal should explain why a course fits, where a mixed pathway is better, and what the cohort will be able to apply after the live training.
A modest pilot is often the stronger start
Choose one service where the need is visible and the people have authority to improve it. Train the roles closest to that work, review the first experiments, and use the evidence to shape the next cohort. Scaling a learning pathway from observed results is more credible than enrolling the entire organization in the same introductory class.
