Achieving the right mix of business features and enablers in Agile Release Train (ART) backlogs is key for delivering value at a sustainable pace in SAFe. Too much focus on just features may slow technical progress, while over-investing in enablers can delay business outcomes. Striking the right balance requires discipline, collaboration, and a clear understanding of both types of backlog items.

This post explains proven techniques to help Product Management, Product Owners, System Architects, and Agile Teams maintain this balance. We’ll also share practical examples and link to helpful resources.

---

1. Understand Business Features vs. Enablers

Before balancing, clarify what each term means in a SAFe ART context:

• Business Features are functional increments that deliver direct value to users or customers. They solve real problems, unlock market opportunities, or improve user experience.

• Enablers support the delivery of business features. They include architecture runway, exploration work, infrastructure, compliance, and technical improvements. Enablers rarely offer direct business value, but they’re essential for sustainable delivery.

For a detailed look at how features and enablers are defined and flow through SAFe, see the SAFe Features and Capabilities page.

---

2. Why Balance Matters

Without a healthy mix of business features and enablers, ARTs run into trouble:

• Focusing only on features can lead to mounting technical debt, fragile systems, and blocked future progress.

• Prioritizing only enablers may result in lost business momentum and frustration for stakeholders.

The solution lies in regular backlog refinement, active involvement from all ART roles, and the discipline to invest in both value delivery and technical enablement.

---

3. Set a WIP Policy for Enablers

Work-in-progress (WIP) policies aren’t just for teams—they also help at the program and train levels. Consider setting a WIP limit for enablers in your ART Backlog. For example, you might decide that no more than 30% of total PI objectives can be enabler-related. This keeps the focus balanced, while still allowing for the technical work needed for future features.

WIP limits are just as important in ARTs as on Kanban boards. Learn more about how this works in SAFe in the SAFe Kanban Systems article.

---

4. Make Enablers Visible and Measurable

Enablers should be treated as first-class backlog items—not hidden technical tasks. Use the same INVEST criteria (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable) for enablers as for features.
Define acceptance criteria, outcomes, and business rationale for each enabler. When you give enablers clear outcomes, stakeholders can see their value and are less likely to de-prioritize them.

---

5. Collaborate on Backlog Refinement

Balancing features and enablers requires ongoing collaboration between Product Management, Product Owners, Architects, and teams. During backlog refinement, discuss upcoming technical needs as well as market opportunities. Encourage architects and technical leaders to advocate for enablers and make a clear case for why they’re critical now—not later.

If you’re looking to grow your Product Owner/Product Manager skills and learn best practices for backlog refinement, consider the SAFe POPM certification.

---

6. Use Capacity Allocation in PI Planning

Capacity allocation is a practical tool for keeping the balance during PI Planning. Set aside a percentage of each team's capacity specifically for enablers. This might be 20-30%, depending on current technical needs and upcoming business commitments.
Adjust this allocation as the ART matures and technical debt is reduced. Document the policy and review it at each PI planning event.

The Leading SAFe Agilist certification covers capacity allocation and other strategic SAFe concepts in detail.

---

7. Involve Stakeholders in Enabler Prioritization

Business stakeholders often focus only on user-facing features. Bring them into the conversation when prioritizing enablers. Explain the risks of neglecting technical work and show how enablers support future business features, system reliability, and security.

Providing data—such as reduced incidents, faster deployments, or lower support costs—can help build support for critical enablers.

---

8. Link Enablers to Business Value

Whenever possible, trace enablers to future business value. For example, an enabler that upgrades the CI/CD pipeline may not deliver a new user feature immediately, but it will enable faster, safer releases in future PIs.
Show how each enabler ties into the roadmap and business objectives. This strengthens your case during backlog prioritization.

If you want to deepen your facilitation skills for technical and business conversations, the SAFe Scrum Master certification offers actionable frameworks.

---

9. Inspect and Adapt at the Program Level

During the Inspect & Adapt (I&A) event, review not just feature delivery but also enabler progress. Use metrics—such as velocity spent on enablers, system stability, or reduction in technical debt—to assess if you’re keeping the right balance.
If you find technical debt is growing, increase the enabler allocation next PI. If business outcomes are slipping, review if enabler work can be streamlined or reprioritized.

SAFe’s I&A event is covered extensively in the SAFe Release Train Engineer certification.

---

10. Leverage Advanced Facilitation Techniques

Balancing these priorities can require skilled facilitation—especially when business and technical leaders disagree. Lean on structured approaches like Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF), impact mapping, or risk assessment workshops to align everyone around shared goals.

If you want to master advanced facilitation techniques for complex ARTs, the SAFe Advanced Scrum Master certification is an excellent resource.

---

11. Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

• Underestimating technical debt: Teams sometimes defer enabler work to meet near-term feature commitments, only to find progress slows later due to mounting issues.

• Overloading with enablers: When technical teams drive the backlog, it’s possible to over-invest in enablers, delaying business outcomes.

• Poor communication: If stakeholders don’t understand enabler value, they’re likely to deprioritize or cut them.

Address these by keeping communication open, using data, and involving the right mix of roles in prioritization.

---

12. Example: Balancing in Practice

Consider an ART developing a cloud-based service. The business wants new user features, but architects flag the need to refactor the authentication module (an enabler).
During PI Planning, the team allocates 25% capacity for technical enablers. The refactor is accepted, as the business sees it enables new customer features and future security requirements. Over the PI, both feature delivery and technical health improve.

---

Final Thoughts

Balancing business features and enablers in ART backlogs is a core discipline for any organization adopting SAFe. By treating both types of work as essential, setting clear policies, and involving all stakeholders in transparent prioritization, ARTs can deliver value today while enabling innovation for tomorrow.

If you’re interested in deepening your expertise, explore SAFe certifications like Leading SAFe Agilist, SAFe POPM, SAFe Scrum Master, SAFe Advanced Scrum Master, or SAFe Release Train Engineer for practical, actionable frameworks.

---

Ready to take your ART backlog management to the next level?
For more expert guidance, training, and certification, visit AgileSeekers or reach out to our team.

---

 Also read - How Kanban improves the flow of work in ART and Solution Train Backlogs

Also see - The role of Product Management and Solution Management in backlog refinement