
Technical debt isn’t always a result of bad code or poor decisions. Often, it’s a deliberate trade-off made to deliver features faster. But if you don’t manage it early, that same shortcut turns into a long-term obstacle—affecting quality, velocity, and even team morale.
Scrum teams often struggle with balancing sprint goals and addressing mounting technical debt. The key is not to eliminate technical debt entirely but to manage it without slowing down delivery.
Technical debt is the cost of rework caused by choosing quick solutions over better long-term ones. It can result from:
Rushed timelines
Incomplete testing
Poor initial architecture
Legacy systems and outdated libraries
When left unchecked, technical debt makes future changes harder, increases bug rates, and leads to unreliable delivery.
Scrum emphasizes sustainable development, continuous improvement, and team ownership. When technical debt piles up, it erodes these foundations. The team becomes slower, less confident, and more reactive.
This is why many topics in CSM certification training stress on practices that help maintain technical health without compromising sprint outcomes.
You can’t manage what you don’t see. Capture technical debt clearly in your backlog. Add tags, labels, or a dedicated section so the team and product owner can view and prioritize it easily.
Typical categories include:
Refactoring needs
Missing test coverage
Obsolete dependencies
Code smells or anti-patterns
When you treat debt like any other backlog item, it becomes part of the conversation—not an afterthought.
Instead of dedicating entire sprints to technical debt, carve out 10–20% of your sprint capacity to address it regularly. This keeps the codebase healthy without delaying feature delivery.
For example, in a 40-point sprint, reserve 6–8 points for technical improvements or cleanup tasks.
Scrum Masters trained through solid CSM training help teams maintain this balance without compromising stakeholder commitments.
Not all debt is equal. Focus on technical debt that:
Blocks new features
Increases defect rates
Slows down deployments
Affects critical user flows
Collaborate with the Product Owner to align technical debt resolution with business outcomes. This builds trust and ensures strategic decisions, not just technical ones.
Use sprint planning to align tech debt work with ongoing product work. If you're modifying a feature, clean up its related code. This reduces the risk of rework and strengthens the code around what matters most.
Rather than isolate technical debt, fold it naturally into product goals wherever possible.
Sprint retrospectives are a perfect time to surface issues related to code quality, infrastructure, or recurring bugs. Use facilitation tools like:
Root cause analysis
5 Whys
Brainstorming impediments
Some teams even dedicate one retrospective every few sprints to reflect on their technical health. This approach supports the continuous improvement pillar of Scrum.
In certified scrum master training, Scrum Masters learn how to facilitate these deeper technical conversations with clarity and impact.
Leave the code cleaner than you found it. If you touch a file or function, improve it a little—even if it’s not part of the story’s acceptance criteria.
This incremental approach spreads refactoring efforts over time without requiring a separate sprint or task. It’s sustainable and keeps the codebase improving with every commit.
Prevent future debt by building guardrails:
Static analysis tools like SonarQube
Linting rules in your CI/CD pipeline
Enforcing minimum test coverage
These tools help catch issues early before they become technical debt. They’re also less prone to bias than manual reviews.
To dive deeper into this approach, you can explore Martin Fowler’s guide to technical debt quadrants—an excellent external resource for teams making strategic decisions.
Tracking technical health with real data helps the team stay accountable. Useful metrics include:
Code complexity (Cyclomatic or Cognitive)
Technical debt ratio
Bug count per sprint
Code churn on specific modules
Over time, trends in these metrics tell you where to focus cleanup efforts. Scrum Masters with good CSM certification experience know how to guide these discussions using data, not assumptions.
Many Product Owners focus only on features unless they understand the long-term cost of technical debt. Help them see how it affects release timelines, team morale, and product quality.
Translate the impact of technical debt into business terms. For instance:
“We’re seeing slower time-to-market because of unstable modules.”
“This debt is causing 40% of our recent production bugs.”
Educated Product Owners are more likely to support regular investment in technical cleanup.
You can’t fight technical debt alone. The team must care about code quality, clean design, and sustainable delivery. Encourage pair programming, code reviews, and test-driven development (TDD).
Scrum Masters play a critical role here. Those who have gone through high-quality certified scrum master training help create environments where teams take pride in maintaining a healthy codebase.
You don’t need to choose between sprint velocity and managing technical debt. When addressed thoughtfully, they support each other. A clean, stable codebase accelerates feature delivery and reduces fire-fighting.
Make technical debt part of the team’s ongoing rhythm. Expose it. Discuss it. Allocate time for it. Measure its impact. And above all, involve the entire team—including stakeholders—in owning the solution.
For Scrum Masters who want to lead this balance confidently, explore CSM certification training to sharpen your facilitation, prioritization, and coaching skills.
Also read - Scrum in Regulated Industries
Also see - Helping Product Owners Build Better Backlogs