
Legacy code can be a major bottleneck for Agile teams. Often riddled with outdated patterns, limited test coverage, and tangled dependencies, it slows delivery and introduces technical debt. However, Scrum’s iterative and incremental approach provides a disciplined framework to chip away at this complexity without derailing delivery goals.
This post explores practical Scrum-based strategies for refactoring legacy code, helping teams deliver value continuously while improving code maintainability.
Legacy systems typically evolved without structured refactoring. They might lack unit tests, contain obsolete technologies, and resist change due to poor design. These issues result in:
To mitigate these problems, development teams must invest in ongoing refactoring. Scrum provides the rhythm and structure to do this gradually without losing sight of sprint goals.
Scrum doesn't dictate engineering practices, but it creates the cadence to build quality iteratively. Here’s how you can embed refactoring efforts within a Scrum team:
Update the team’s Definition of Done to include code cleanliness, removal of duplication, and improved readability. If refactoring becomes a shared accountability in the DoD, it won’t be left as an afterthought.
This not only aligns with certified scrum master training principles but also ensures a sustainable pace of development.
Refactor while implementing new features or fixing bugs. Don’t go looking for refactoring opportunities—make it a habit to clean as you go. For instance, when modifying a class, take time to apply the Single Responsibility Principle or eliminate duplication in the methods.
Legacy refactoring isn’t a one-off task. Use sub-tasks in the sprint backlog to scope changes realistically. A Product Backlog Item (PBI) like “Refactor data access layer for product module” can be decomposed into:
Use spikes to investigate refactoring strategies—e.g., analyzing the impact of introducing dependency injection. Document learnings and use them to create technical stories. This helps avoid guesswork in future sprints.
Work with the Product Owner to include refactoring items in the backlog. Label them as “tech debt” so they don’t get deprioritized indefinitely. Over time, the team can estimate these tasks and prioritize them based on risk, value, or urgency.
Retrospectives are ideal for surfacing code pain points. If multiple developers struggle with the same class or module, that’s a clear sign it needs refactoring. The Scrum Master can help capture these insights and facilitate backlog items or DoD updates.
If you're pursuing SAFe Scrum Master certification, you'll learn how to scale such quality improvements across multiple teams.
One challenge teams face is balancing feature delivery and code improvement. Here’s how you can maintain this balance:
| Strategy | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Timebox Refactoring Sub-Tasks | Prevents gold-plating; keeps effort visible |
| Use Story Points for Refactor Items | Helps in velocity tracking and sprint planning |
| Agree on a Refactoring Budget per Sprint | Ensures sustainable investment in tech debt |
| Track Refactoring KPIs | Gives visibility into improvements |
You can’t refactor safely without sufficient test coverage. Teams must aim for high unit test coverage before touching core modules. Practices like test pyramids help balance unit, integration, and end-to-end tests.
Additionally, modern CI pipelines with automated regression testing act as safety nets during refactoring. For deeper Scrum alignment, integrate testing into every sprint and inspect it during the csm certification training sessions.
The Product Owner must understand the value of a maintainable codebase. Use sprint reviews to demo not just features, but also before-and-after snapshots of code improvements. This reinforces the importance of long-term technical health.
While not always needed, dedicated refactoring sprints can help tackle systemic legacy issues—like migrating from a monolith to microservices or introducing a new ORM. Use them sparingly and follow them with normal feature-focused sprints to maintain business momentum.
Legacy code can be transformed gradually through a disciplined, Scrum-based approach. By embedding refactoring into your sprints, involving the Product Owner, and tracking progress using structured backlog items, teams can reduce technical debt without sacrificing velocity.
Interested in helping your team drive quality? Explore csm training and SAFe Scrum Master Training to deepen your Agile expertise and gain the tools to lead effective refactoring initiatives.
Also read - Optimizing Database Changes and Migrations in Sprint Cycles