Managing Dependencies Across ARTs - A Product Owner's Guide

Blog Author
Siddharth
Published
23 Apr, 2025
Managing Dependencies Across ARTs

In large-scale agile implementations, effective dependency management can mean the difference between seamless execution and costly disruption. As a Product Owner/Product Manager (POPM) working within the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe), you face the challenging task of identifying, tracking, and resolving dependencies across multiple Agile Release Trains (ARTs). This responsibility requires both strategic vision and tactical execution.

The most successful POPMs master dependency management as a critical skill—one that directly impacts program predictability, team morale, and ultimately, value delivery. Having completed my SAFe POPM certification, I've witnessed firsthand how proper dependency management transforms program execution.

Understanding the Dependency Challenge

Dependencies in SAFe environments take many forms:

  • Cross-ART dependencies: When one ART's work depends on deliverables from another ART
  • Cross-team dependencies: When teams within the same ART depend on each other's work
  • External dependencies: When ARTs depend on vendors, partners, or external systems
  • Architecture dependencies: When technical decisions create upstream or downstream impacts
  • Regulatory or compliance dependencies: When work must align with specific regulatory requirements

The real challenge lies not just in identifying these dependencies but in creating visibility, establishing accountability, and coordinating resolution—all while maintaining the rhythm of Program Increments (PIs) and iteration cycles.

Dependency Management Boards: Creating Visibility

Dependency management begins with visibility. You can't manage what you can't see.

Physical vs. Digital Boards

Many SAFe implementations start with physical dependency boards—large whiteboards or wall spaces where dependencies are tracked using sticky notes, often color-coded by type or severity. Physical boards offer immediate visual impact during PI Planning sessions and program events.

However, digital dependency boards have become increasingly important, especially with distributed teams. Tools like Jira Align, Rally, Azure DevOps, and even specialized SAFe platforms provide robust dependency visualization capabilities.

Creating an Effective Dependency Board

Whether physical or digital, effective dependency boards typically include:

  1. Dependency ID: A unique identifier for tracking
  2. Description: Clear explanation of the dependency
  3. Provider/Consumer: Who provides the work and who depends on it
  4. Required Date: When the dependency needs resolution
  5. Status: Current state (Open, In Progress, Resolved, Blocked)
  6. Impact: What happens if the dependency isn't resolved
  7. Risk Level: Typically High/Medium/Low
  8. Owner: Person responsible for tracking and driving resolution

The most effective POPMs ensure dependency boards remain living documents—not just artifacts created during PI Planning and then forgotten.

ART Sync Meetings: The Heartbeat of Dependency Resolution

Identifying dependencies creates awareness, but resolution requires consistent coordination. ART Sync meetings provide the mechanism for this ongoing alignment.

Structure of Effective ART Syncs

The most productive ART Sync meetings for dependency management follow a clear structure:

  1. Dependency Review: Walk through open dependencies with owners reporting status
  2. New Dependencies: Identify any newly discovered dependencies
  3. Blockers: Highlight dependencies at risk of missing deadlines
  4. Escalations: Determine which dependencies require escalation to Solution or Portfolio level
  5. Action Items: Assign clear next steps with owners and due dates

Cadence Considerations

While many organizations hold ART Syncs weekly, the optimal frequency depends on your context:

  • Weekly Syncs: Best for complex programs with numerous cross-ART dependencies
  • Bi-weekly Syncs: Often sufficient for mature ARTs with established coordination patterns
  • Pre/Post Iteration Syncs: Align dependency discussions with the start or end of iterations

The most successful POPMs find the right rhythm that provides sufficient coordination without meeting overload.

Tools for Dependency Visibility and Management

While processes matter, tools enable scalability. Modern SAFe implementations leverage a variety of tools for dependency management.

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Platforms like:

  • Jira Align: Offers enterprise-level dependency visualization across portfolios
  • Rally/Broadcom: Provides robust dependency tracking within its program management features
  • Azure DevOps: Enables dependency linking with its work item relationship features
  • VersionOne: Includes dependency tracking within its program boards

Each tool offers different visualization capabilities, from simple link relationships to sophisticated dependency graphs and impact analysis.

Integration Tools

Beyond dedicated agile planning tools, successful POPMs also leverage:

  • Integration middleware: Tools like Tasktop that synchronize dependencies across different platforms
  • Visualization extensions: Custom plugins that enhance dependency visualization
  • Reporting tools: PowerBI or Tableau dashboards that provide dependency health metrics
  • Communication platforms: Microsoft Teams or Slack channels dedicated to dependency resolution

The right tool combination depends on your organization's size, complexity, and existing technology ecosystem.

Having completed SAFe Product Owner Training, I've learned that successful dependency management requires both technical solutions and human coordination.

Best Practices for Dependency Management

Beyond boards, meetings, and tools, certain practices differentiate highly effective dependency management:

Proactive Identification

The best POPMs don't wait for PI Planning to identify dependencies. They:

  • Conduct pre-planning sessions focused specifically on identifying potential dependencies
  • Review upcoming features and stories specifically looking for dependency implications
  • Engage architecture teams to identify technical dependencies early
  • Create "dependency thinking" as a cultural norm within teams

Clear Ownership

Successful dependency management requires accountability. Effective practices include:

  • Assigning a specific owner to each dependency
  • Differentiating between the dependency owner (who tracks it) and resolvers (who do the work)
  • Including dependency management in regular role expectations
  • Recognizing and rewarding proactive dependency management

Metrics That Matter

What gets measured gets managed. Effective dependency metrics include:

  • Dependency Resolution Rate: Percentage of dependencies resolved on time
  • Dependency Aging: How long dependencies remain open
  • Late Detection Rate: How many dependencies are identified after PI Planning
  • Dependency Volume Trends: Whether dependency counts are increasing or decreasing over time
  • Impact Analysis: Business impact of unresolved dependencies

These metrics help POPMs identify systemic issues in dependency management processes.

Improving Your Dependency Management Maturity

Dependency management capabilities evolve over time. Consider these progressive improvements:

Level 1: Basic Tracking

Start with simple dependency lists and regular reviews. Focus on:

  • Creating consistent identification processes
  • Establishing basic tracking mechanisms
  • Building the habit of dependency discussions

Level 2: Structured Management

Advance to formalized processes including:

  • Regular dependency management meetings
  • Standard templates and tracking tools
  • Clear ownership and escalation paths

Level 3: Predictive Management

Mature organizations move toward:

  • Predictive identification of dependencies
  • Pattern recognition to address systemic dependency issues
  • Integration of dependency management into portfolio planning

Level 4: Strategic Minimization

The most advanced organizations focus on:

  • Architectural decisions that reduce dependency creation
  • Team and ART structures that minimize dependencies
  • Value stream alignment that naturally reduces cross-ART dependencies

Earning your POPM certification equips you with the foundation for this journey, but practical implementation will teach you the nuances for your specific context.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Even experienced POPMs encounter challenges with dependency management:

The "Discovery at PI Boundaries" Problem

When dependencies surface primarily during PI boundaries, it indicates reactive rather than proactive management. Combat this by:

  • Implementing "Look-Ahead Planning" practices
  • Creating dependency identification checkpoints throughout the PI
  • Incentivizing early dependency identification

The "Tracking Without Resolution" Syndrome

Some organizations become proficient at identifying dependencies but struggle with resolution. Address this by:

  • Creating clear resolution paths for different dependency types
  • Establishing escalation criteria and processes
  • Building dependency resolution into iteration planning

The "Tool Obsession" Trap

Organizations sometimes focus excessively on tools while neglecting processes. Maintain balance by:

  • Starting with the process, then selecting supporting tools
  • Ensuring tools enhance rather than complicate visibility
  • Creating simple manual processes before automation

Real-World Application: A Case Study

Consider how a financial services organization tackled cross-ART dependencies during a major platform modernization:

Initially, they struggled with numerous dependencies between their five ARTs, resulting in missed commitments and frequent escalations. Their transformation included:

  1. Visualization: They created dedicated dependency walls during PI Planning with physical cards and string showing relationships
  2. Prioritization: They categorized dependencies as "Showstoppers" (must resolve) vs. "Impediments" (would improve velocity if resolved)
  3. Coordination: They established bi-weekly cross-ART dependency syncs
  4. Metrics: They tracked "dependency debt" and "dependency lead time"

The results were significant: They reduced dependency-related delays by 62% within three PIs and improved predictability scores across all ARTs.

Conclusion: The POPM as Dependency Master

As a POPM, you stand at the center of value delivery. Mastering dependency management transforms you from a feature coordinator to a true value flow enabler. Start by implementing basic visualization, establish regular coordination mechanisms, leverage appropriate tools, and continuously improve your processes.

Remember that dependency management isn't just about tracking—it's about creating transparency, building collaboration, and ultimately enabling faster value delivery through coordinated execution.

Those who have completed SAFe POPM certification training understand that dependency management represents one of the most practical applications of SAFe principles in action.

By focusing on this critical skill, you'll not only improve your program's performance but also demonstrate the strategic leadership that distinguishes exceptional POPMs from the rest.

 

What dependency management practices have you found most effective in your SAFe implementation? Share your experiences in the comments below.

 

Also Read - Navigating Feature Toggles and Technical Enablers as a SAFe POPM

Also check - Applying the System Demo Feedback Loop

Share This Article

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on WhatsApp

Have any Queries? Get in Touch